•  
  •  
 
Perpetua: The UAH Journal of Undergraduate Research

College

College of Education

Department

Kinesiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the effects of ankle bracing (rigid and semi-rigid) on performance in collegiate volleyball players. METHODS: Thirteen female division II collegiate volleyball players (height = 179.95cm ± 3.42; weight = 72.26 ± 6.01kg) were randomly assigned to a bracing condition (rigid, semirigid, no brace) and completed 3 different performance assessment skills. The T2 Active Ankle brace (Akron, OH) was used for the rigid brace and an AS1 Pro laceup (Akron, OH) was used as the semi-rigid brace. Each participant performed a lower body power test, straight line speed test, and lateral movement speed test on three separate occasions. Lower body power was measured using a vertical jump test. Straight line speed was measured using a 20-yard sprint. Lateral movement speed was measured using a four-corner agility drill. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p <.05) between bracing condition for vertical jump height, straight-line speed, or lateral movement speed. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of bracing (either rigid or semi-rigid) as a preventative measure does not significantly affect performance in collegiate volleyball athletes.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.